Written by Matt Stevenson
Here’s the xG from a disappointing performance. Although at 75 minutes I certainly hadn’t written off our chances. Villa took the lead early on, a deflected shot from Watkins found Bailey who went past Kelly and squared the ball to an unmarked Luiz in the box (55%). Luiz’s run was clever having come back from an offside position and with defenders not clear as to who should be picking him up. We had a big chance (about 1 in 4) from Anthony in the 10th minute, from the left-hand side of the goal. The next half-chance was from Ouattara (rated as 1 in 5) which might be a header that was cleared from the line (being at ground level didn’t help to perceive depth) which was closely followed by Neto stopping well from Watkins (approaching 1 in 3). After this burst of action, not much happened for about 40 minutes, with Villa content to time waste and sit on 1-0. The main highlights were a blasted free kick by Billing that Martinez tipped over and Solanke being put through one on one, but dithered (maybe due to a lack of confidence) which allowed Mings to get back and block, and also heavily reduce the xG.
When we made a sub (Brooks for Smith) the xG was Villa 1.46 AFCB 0.96. Whatever the reason, after this substitution the game turned and the xG until the end of the game was Villa 1.74 AFCB 0.00. Villa had three big chances, the second goal where Ramsey went around Stephens and slotted under Neto’s arm (it was either well planned or not hit correctly) which was rated 37%. The next large chance was from Mings which was well saved by Neto (2 in 5) and then there was Villa’s third goal. A flick on left Buendia unmarked in front of Neto to head in (56%). It was a disappointing capitulation in the last 10 minutes, but before that, it was fairly even.
Man of the match against Aston VillaNetoO. DangoTraoreRothwellSomeone else |
For the majority of the game the average positions are largely unremarkable, a standard back four, three within the middle, two wingers and a target man. The first set of substitutions changed this slightly with Rothwell (14) and Anthony (32) being replaced by Traore (22) and Semenyo (24). Both moved left of centre, with Billing (29) presumably dropping more central. The next substitution was heart-warming being the return of Brooks (7) for Smith (15). Villa had made it 2 nil before the tactics paper had been handed around the team but possibly we were going to shift to a back 3, and have Brooks (7) and one other as the wide men. However, this didn’t work, and we were under constant pressure as witnessed by Brooks’s average position. Subs were made in the final minutes with Ouattara and Billing being replaced with Vina and Moore, although there was not enough time to work out this formation.
Our players tried to take on a man 25 times, being successful 12 times. Ouattara made the most attempts with 5 successful take-ons (from 8) although Rothwell did well with 4 successful attempts from 4.
We had 10 attempts (1 big) noting that chances can be provided after saves or a defensive error and not created. This big chance was for Anthony who if I remember correctly dispossessed an opponent. We hit the target 3 times. Villa had 20 attempts, 5 big, and hit the target 9 times.
Traore and Ouattara made the most tackles (7) although Traore had limited game time. As a team, Bournemouth won 20 of 39 tackles.
USCherry wrote…
The way we defend set pieces I am surprised that the stattos don’t start rating corners against us as a 1 in 5 chance
Just out of interest and I apologize if you already have answered this. But it looks like the last goal, rated 56% but seems to show on the graph as 0.7 xG. Does the % correlate to xG somehow differently to e.g. 25% = .25 xG
Matt Stevenson replied…
Eagle Eyes there.
It is actually two chances here, as Mings’ flick-on was counted as an attempt and was judged to have its own rating of 0.10 so it was a combination of 0.1+0.56 to make a total for 0.66.
For simplicity, I ignore multiple chances, unless the summed xG goes above 1, but I think it should really only total 0.604 as if Mings had scored you wouldn’t get the 0.56 chance. But given the error bars in the xG scores I’m happy to ignore this and save myself some work. – To join the conversation, click here.
Villa content to waste time !!!, I think you need to watch the match again, they controlled it from start to finish.